MacAskill shoots himself in the foot

In a break of convention, MSPs were not given an hour of preparation time before hearing SNP Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill deliver a ministerial statement on the routine deployment of armed police in Scotland.

Mr MacAskill gave no explanation for this. Perhaps he needed more time to transpose the speech into rhyming couplets so suit his oratorical style. Maybe there was a printer error. Or it could be that, as reported in The Courier, drafting was still taking place.

Whatever the reason, it is not an administration at ease with its position on the armed police. Taking a closer look at the statement further, other questions emerge.

Mr MacAskill said:

“The current standing firearms authority was given by the Chief Constable after an assessment of a range of factors including evidence and intelligence. This authority is not new. Three of the former constabularies – Strathclyde, Tayside and indeed Northern – had endorsed this position prior to the inception of the service.”

The “indeed” makes this art. It is used to highlight the particular concerns of the Highlands which has been steadfastly opposed to the policy – highlighted by the overwhelming vote of Highland Councillors calling for a review of the policy.

But what did Northern Constabulary actually agree to before it was enveloped by the SNP’s centralised force? Did Highland police officers have this standing authority prior to Police Scotland?

In February 2013, one month before Northern Constabulary was disbanded, a report of the Northern Police Board stated:

“As part of the national policing review, Northern Constabulary is actively progressing road policing and armed response capabilities, which will be in place in February 2013. Whilst this has been an aspiration for Northern Constabulary for some time, it will accord with and meet the approved proposals of the Police Service of Scotland.”

As Deputy Leader of Highland Council David Alston told the Press and Journal:

“You would need to be a mind reader to know that this referred to a change of policy which would allow armed police on to the streets. But what it does make clear is that this was a policy driven forward by Police Scotland, even before it took over control.”

Not only is this Justice Secretary unapologetic about having armed police routinely patrolling Scotland’s streets, but he is claiming the Highlands endorsed the policy when he knows this is not the case.

The Justice Secretary could have taken all afternoon to re-write his statement. It still would not have satisfied Highlanders who have had enough of this deeply illiberal Justice Secretary and his deeply illiberal policies.

A budget that delivers for Scotland

imagesAs John Swinney hits copy and paste on every budget response the SNP has ever sent out, here are just a few of the reasons why he is wrong:

  • 2.3 million Scots getting £800 tax cut by April 2015 due to increase in personal allowance to £10,500
  • 263,000 Scots taken out of tax altogether thanks to increase in tax allowance
  • Duty frozen and escalator scrapped for Scotch whisky industry supporting 35,000 jobs across the UK
  • Childcare subsidy of up to £2000 plus an extra £55million for the Scottish Government to spend on childcare (should SNP decide to do so…)
  • Savings tax being reduced to 0% benefitting 116,000 savers in Scotland
  • Over £2.2 billion of extra investment in Scotland since spending review of 2010
  • Regional Air Connectivity Fund to help finance new routes from rural and island communities to the rest of UK and abroad

Not to mention VAT relief for air ambulances and inshore rescue boats, investment package for the oil and gas industry, and business energy cost initiative saving Scottish businesses up to £500 million.

I could go on. Maybe like Ed Miliband, John didn’t actually listen to the budget. Bless.

Two Ugandas

I know two Ugandas.


President Museveni signs the anti-Homosexual bill into law

One, the warm and welcoming country where I have spent a year and a half of my life, is a world away from the other – an oppressive, prejudicial regime which today joined the epidemic of homosexual hatred that is sweeping Africa.

My friends and colleagues, men and woman of, among others, the Bakiga, Acholi and Buganda tribes are open to outsiders, curious of new cultures and kind and generous hosts, sometimes to an embarrassing degree.

The men and woman who applauded and cheered as the anti-Homosexual bill was made law today are part of another Uganda, but it is this Uganda, the regressive Uganda, which is now at centre stage.

Since I returned to Scotland from Uganda at the end of 2013, the diverging paths taken by the two governments are clear for all to see.

On 4th February 2014, the Scottish Parliament took the historic step to legalise same-sex marriage in Scotland. Today, 24th February 2014, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni signed the anti-Homosexual Bill into law.

The former decision is part of the wider progressive movement which will not compromise on equality. But this movement is being met by its counterpoint – a movement to spread fear, hatred and intolerance to millions. Homosexuality is now illegal in 83 countries across the world, 38 of which are in Africa. It is a movement gathering pace in other countries too, most notably Russia.

For Uganda, the decision to sign up to be the newest member of the anti-equality club, has many facets.

There is a political expedience. President Museveni, in an effort to sure up support for next election in 2016, is tapping into a long-held belief that outside, colonial influences are on the rise. Since Idi Amin expelled the countries Asian population in the 1972, a decision still popular among many today, Ugandan leaders have wanted to appear tough to outside influences, even if it is to the detriment of the country. In the 1970s, it was the economy that suffered. Today it is equality.

Appearing to stand up to President Obama, Archbishop Tutu and 25,000 people from the UK who have written to the Uganda President against this action will make Museveni more popular.

On the ground, the strong stance against so-called foreign influence can be seen in increasing taxes on foreign owned investment (except Chinese oil exploration) and increased spot checks, and sometimes harassment, of foreign workers. It is a good idea to have a copy of work permits and passports on your person at all times as some have been imprisoned for not showing their papers when confronted by police.

There is the bully pulpit. In a very religious country, where most go to church at least once a week, religious leaders have the opportunity to pour poison into the ears of millions. I have heard it myself – “the abomination of homosexuality” – preached as gospel to congregations from all religions and all tribes. This action is being fuelled by money from right-wing evangelical groups from the United States which promise aid in return for a unashamedly pro-abstience, anti-homosexual message.

There is old fashioned prejudice. Homosexuals are to blame for numerous ills – crop failure, drought, but mainly the spread of HIV. This is just one many myths of HIV in Uganda and across East Africa – in fact rates of infection are now higher amongst hetrosexuals – but it all helps to fuel the feral fear which threatens to envelop East Africa.

Amnesty International has said the passage of the anti-Homsexual bill into law is a very grave episode in Uganda’s history.

I agree, and it will continue this way unless the progressive, welcoming voices that I know in Uganda find their voice against the prejudice and hatred.

%d bloggers like this: